Showing posts with label morgan pillsbury gell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label morgan pillsbury gell. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Laura again slips out of the restraints and steals a computer


How delightful that Laura mentioned John Fund and Gail Heriot, who eagerly helped him put up the 'John Fund' website which was hastily removed a few weeks ago.  

Read Gail's love letter to John, the link reproduced here from  our JohnFund Site, chock full of real evidence.  

January 13, 2002 -  John Fund Email exchange with Gail Heriot 
                                    Gail's Face Book     Gail Heriot's Website    Gail Heriot
 
Note that John Fund, who battered Morgan in 2001 and 2002, took down his site, which contained the deposition in which Morgan admitted she is a habitual liar and claimed to have Borderline Personality Disorder.  It can be read  below, on


February 22, 2001 - Morgan Pillsbury Deposition,”in the matter of  Case No. 233136. 
                                 The suit was settled before Morgan could read the deposition and 
                                 certify it as true and accurate.  It was therefore illegal for it to be given 
                                 out.
Normally, responding to someone like Laura Ann Smith, AKA Laura, Duchess of Manchester, is a waste of time.  Her lies are blatant, simply ignoring the evidence. 

This, and other evidence which exposes the motivations which activated the Bush White House to go after Melinda and Morgan in the Spring of 2003 can be read on John Fund, the website put up several weeks ago by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, who is a journalist.  

More on this story can be read on Veracity Voice.  Find out why Saddam Hussein had to die - and why Dan O'Dowd is a billionaire today. 

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Morgan, Craig and Alex, all psychopaths


This site, and the following sites are part of an ongoing effort to help people fight the psychopaths who prey on all of us. The specific individuals named below are psychopaths, or highly unethical individuals working with psychopaths, who joined together in a conspiracy. Craig Franklin, Dan O'Dowd and Morgan Gell – 1997, Alexander, 13th Duke of Manchester and Laura, Duchess of Manchester – 2011 joined together to destroy me, which sounds melodramatic, but is actually pretty accurate.  

 Alexander, 13thDuke of Manchester, entrapped Wendy Buford Montagu in a fraudulent marriage in 1993 and in 2006 found Laura to help him strip her of everything she owned. When they joined together they all become co-conspirators in their attempts to destroy both Wendy and myself, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster.

Most run away. We fight back with the truth. We urge you to read their posts as nothing could be more revealing to their real characters.


It is essential for our own safety we understand how psychopaths see us. 
 
Believing what I am about to tell you can be an agonizing realization, I know that because I have been there. But for your own safety, and for the well-being and security of those you love who are normal, you need to wrap your mind around it.
The psychopath in your life may be to you a child, a brother, a parent or a spouse, but they see you as a domesticated animal, food, pleasure, or profit, on the hoof. They'll exert effort to keep you in shape for what they have planned, but have no doubt where you are headed. One day you will be simply 'harvested.'
Since their lives are, essentially and necessarily lived as a long lie to keep us complacent and producing for them.
Psychopaths may need, and attach to, normal people who allow them to seem more normal. That was the case both for myself and Wendy Buford Montagu. Comparing notes was very illuminating.
Wendy's husband, Alex, 13th Duke of Manchester, was sofa-surfing, living on the never-to-be-realized expectations of people who were hosting him when he managed to grab onto Wendy, who was employed and had her own car. Wendy was, and is very attractive as well. Psychopaths looking for a victim generally want resources and stability. Wendy met his requirements. Additionally, she was young and of child-bearing age. Alex knew he would receive payments from the Manchester Trust for each child born.
He did not hesitate to deceive and then launch attempts to suck her dry, in every way he could devise. See LINK
For a psychopath, who cannot fully emulate human emotions having a spouse who acts as an interface to the world can be essential.
That was one of the functions I carried out, unwittingly, for my psychopathic husband, Craig Franklin. But once he saw ways to move on the transition was carried out with ruthless ugliness. Here is what happened.
When I met Craig
He was a software engineer with no savings. That, I knew, what I did not know was that his psychopathic condition made it impossible for him to file his tax returns, which left him chronically garnished and broke.
Craig positioned himself as a Libertarian. He is not, since he routinely uses deceit and violence to achieve his ends. He was also was not a tax protester, he just did not file, thus paying into state coffers money he did not owe. He was being garnisheed by multiple agencies without my knowledge, I discovered in January of 1997. Pay Stub. List of Garnishments 1987 – 1997
Craig brought the problem with him and lied to me. I could have filed as an innocent spouse, but instead I went to work to save Craig, whose health was failing. At that point he was beginning to soil the sheets in our bed as well as leaving feces in the bath tub. I solved the problem for Craig at enormous cost to myself, having spent weeks of 18 hour days going over the records Craig had hidden from me at work.
Less than two weeks after garnishments stopped and refunds began coming in, these would eventually come to around $250,000, my oldest son, who Craig had adopted along with the others, at his insistence, suffered a major brain injury in a motorcycle accident.
With the problem of the IRS behind him and my attention on our son, Craig decided to eliminate me. With me out of the way he could live out his fantasy life.
If he had just told me he wanted a divorce and split the assets, as was fair, I would simply have forgotten him and moved on. But his goal was to get everything and leave me destitute and homeless. This was part of his fantasy, repeated frequently to both Morgan and Anne Fisher.
Affidavit I (Page Two – Paragrahs 4 & 5) “Craig talked to me all the time. He consistently broght up the same several subjects, repeating himself nearly every time we talked.
One of these was his desire to see my mother penniless and pushing a shopping cart in fuzzy slippers.”
Do not expect fair play or decency from a psychopath.


Throw Mama from the Train – Craig and Dan cut a deal
It was during this period that Craig cut a deal with his boss, Dan O'Dowd, to create a different stock option agreement with language recommended by Misho, “future, future, future,” 1999 Phone Transcript (Page 6 – Seventh Paragraph) so, as he left me, he could guarantee I received nothing from our only marital asset. All option agreements for all employees, including Craig's, acknowledged as the most valuable employee and given the highest award, were issued simultaneously in 1996, were for past work. I was told this by Craig in 1996.
Craig signed the agreement in my presence, having written some additional language, which I read at the time.
Green Hills Software successfully resisted discovery on the language of any other stock option agreement and the court refused to enforce our demand during the divorce. At this point I began to understand something was very wrong with the court system.
Dan needed Craig, who had been the pivotal factor in making Green Hills Software hugely profitable. Dan also wanted to cut out his partner, who had provided the original funding, Glenn Hightower. Documents for Hightower – O'Dowd law suit are available at Just the Evidence.
Craig made this possible by persuading the other employees to refuse to cooperate with a Hightower buyout. This is testified to by Wayne B. Weisman, Partner in an equity fund, Private Equity Partners, LP. Exhibit 7a (Page 2- Paragraph 9)
Morgan Affidavit I (Page 2 – Paragraph 7 & 8) “About the Green Hills buyout, he said he and Dan had a deal, had helped each other out. He compared it to the movie, “Throw Mama from the Train” The whole family had seen the movie together so I knew exactly what he meant.
Craig said many times, “They could not be caught.”
Morgan Affidavit I (Page 1 – bottom) “In the summer of 1998 Craig told me gleefully he and other employees he had been talking to at GHS stood up at a conference and walked out, right past Hightower. Hightower was Dan's partner and and was trying to buy the company. It was, Craig said, quite a confrontation. Craig said many times his stock would be worth a lot more if they could dump Hightower. Dan made promises to make it worth their while. Craig also said he was getting extra stock for payment for cooperation on top of Dan screwing over our mother. Craig also said Dan was pussy whipped and Amy ran Dan.”
The offer price by O'Dowd of 47 million to Hightower was far below the actual valuation of the company at the time, from what I knew from Craig before he left. I was told by Craig, at the time, the company was actually worth 350 million.
Green Hills Software, Inc., is a War Contractor, now making essential components for drones. They began getting government contracts in 2003. This story involves John Fund, former WSJ Pundit. This story will appear in the book, now being written. The company is located at 30 West Sola, in Santa Barbara. See Drone Free Zone.
One might wonder why Craig would talk so much about subjects which, clearly were highly volatile. This happens because Craig's condition makes not talking about what he is doing impossible for him.

In 1998 Morgan was living in Los Angeles in an apartment I had rented and decorated for her myself. I bought the material for drapes and the furniture in early 1998 before the IRS matter was settled through drastic economies elsewhere. The last time I was in her apartment, because she became hostile and antagonistic, was late summer of that year. I had been by and brought her roses for the dining room table I also bought for her. She was thirty and had never worked, and never finished school. Looking back, I realize I should have noticed something was very wrong with her. But I try to make the people I love happy and I always tried to be understanding.
For about eight years, from the time she moved in with us, when my sister, Anne kicked her out, until they broke up, she was pretending to go to college but actually having an affair with Eddy van Halen. I did not know about this until years later.
In 1997 she was in a relationship with Eugene Volokh, Professor of Law at UCLA, who she had met at the conference for the RLC I put on in Santa Barbara in 1995.
It was Morgan who found an attorney, Jacqueline Misho, for Craig, as stated in her affidavit.
I helped Craig in every way that I could. It was I who found his divorce attorney for him.” Affidavit I (Page 1 – Paragraph 4)

This affidavit also gives evidence of the kind of manipulation Craig routinely used. Morgan states I told her she had to start working. Affidavit (page one, paragraph two)
I did so because, to my surprise, after we no longer had financial problems because I had solved the tax problem, Craig came to me and insisted I do so. This was done to set up his use of Morgan. I had asked she have time to get a job or finish college. He grudgingly extended support for a full year. Craig's motive was to activate Morgan as a tool and he did so in spades.
In late November, 1997, Arthur began rehabilitation, he had survived, but lost around two years of academic accomplishments. It is true of brain injuries, I now know, that they change you completely. Survivors say they count the day of the injury as the first day of their lives. I found this is also true of any family member who stands by them.
Craig, to my surprise, expressed a wish to take the entire family to Hawaii for Christmas as a celebration. His motives were actually very different. He wanted me out of Santa Barbara, so he could have the house to himself. He knew that, having paid off all our massive debts with the refunds from the IRS, I would want to pay off the vacation immediately, leaving me with little money at the end of January. He wanted to force an early settlement by ensuring I could not afford an attorney or pay my bills.
He returned to California a week before me and used the time to have his attorney rummage through my private papers, removing many which were never returned, and to go through my computer, taking what ever she thought would be useful to her. Morgan attested to this fact in her Affidavit I (Page two – Paragraphs two & three)
Craig also filed for divorce. The plan seems to have been to claim the date of grant was after we were separated. This failed because of the weight of proof I was still paying his bills and he handling his domestic needs. Checks written by Melinda January 1998. The phoney stock option agreement was written by an attorney in Los Angeles, Ruth Fisher and signed with Craig three days earlier. This is attested to in 1999 Transcript (Page two – Paragraph 5) with Craig supplying the name of the attorney, Ruth Fisher, and other details.
When Craig called to tell me he was leaving his just washed dirty clothes were still warm and had just been put away. The day was January 23, 1998.
Morgan's next assignment was to work to suborn her siblings, telling them ugly, and untrue things about me. She also contacted my friends, telling them the same ugly and untrue stories. Emerling Cloud began doing the same among my Libertarian friends and acquaintances.
Morgan is also a psychopath.
It was like being hit by an invisible tsunami.
There are rules you can follow which immunize you from becoming a victim. We'll get into those later here and in my book, now being written.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Update on Post Ayn Pillsbury Declaration


The idea behind PsychoBusting is to provide a through line for information making it impossible for the psychopathic to continue their predatory behavior.  This depends on making evidence available, which comes in all kinds. Just the Evidence was started to fulfill this need. 

Since it is annoying to remember where I parked documents I'm putting all those relating to the events chronicled on the five sites linked to Just the Evidence, plus more I could not decide where to put. 

 Fortuitously, it is now possible to provide this on a blogger website.  I just love technology. 

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Declaration - Ayn Pillsbury - June 1999

Personal Declaration
Ayn Suzanne Pillsbury


The first episode of violence I recall was the year I was in eighth grade. That would have been in the autumn of 1988. Craig had taken us into the family room, just the kids. Mom wasn’t there. Craig wanted to talk to us about how incompetent Mom was. It was bad stuff about Mom. He was trying to win our loyalty. So then Mom came home and came into the room wanting to participate in the discussion. Craig was very angry and told her he was having a private discussion with the kids and that she wasn’t welcome.

Of course, being our mother, she believed the contrary. None of us objected to her being there. Then he became very loud and vituperative and became vocally and physically intimidating. He wrestled Mom to the ground and was on top of her holding her down and hitting her and so all of us kids were torn. We didn’t know what to do. We wanted to get him off of her, so I picked up a bar bell which was probably from 12 - 15 pounds and sort of tapped Craig with it on the back, not really wanting to hurt him but wanting him to realize that we didn’t approve of what he was doing. I don’t know how well it worked. Eventually he got off her.

There was some discussion for a while, Mom saying why she should be able to stay and Craig saying why she should leave. Then Craig again became very angry and punched Mom in the jaw, knocking her out cold. Of course she was standing so she fell over and I thought she might have struck her head on the hearth stones. So she hit the floor and we were all worried she was dead. She wasn’t responding. Craig left her there. We ran and got some water and someone felt her pulse. Then Scott and Edi and Justin went to call the police. We stayed with Mom until she came around and the police came but Craig wasn’t arrested because Mom told them not to arrest him.

Mom did not hit Craig. Mom never hit Craig. Mom is the least violent person I know. Craig never scrupled to use physical intimidation to get what he wanted.

Craig called me either Sunday night or Monday after he left Mom on January 23rd. I had been gone for the weekend. Craig called me and told me that he was divorcing Mom. This was a great surprise to me since we had just been on a family vacation over Christmas which was happy and uneventful with the exception of the following violent outburst by Craig.

I was on the laptop computer chatting with someone on line. It was around 10:00 p.m. Each time I received a message from the person I was chatting with it made a dinging sound. Craig was trying to sleep in an adjacent room and yelled at me to get off the computer because the noise was bothering him. I was in the process of getting off and he yelled one more warning, I think, before coming out just after I had gotten off, slamming the top of the computer down and yelling at Mom who had come out in anticipation of his rage to try to get me off the computer.

He yelled at her that it was her fault because she hadn’t gotten me off the computer. He slammed her into the wall. Mom had bruises for a while after that. And that was the last violent episode I witnessed between my Mom and Craig.

To finish the story of my conversation with Craig, Craig said to me that he had first decided on a divorce three months before he actually told my Mom. Which would put the date sometime in mid-October, roughly after my brother Edi’s near-fatal motorcycle accident. I have a hard time believing that the two are not related. He never represented to me that he had given my Mom any warning. I know she would have mentioned it if he had. When I asked him why he was doing this, he said that he didn’t think he had made her happy in all the 14 years they were together. He offered no real explanation. He never mentioned my Mom’s heroic rescue of our finances or feeling grateful to her. That surprised me. He said he didn’t care about the money and he wanted to make sure my mom was provided for, that he could always go and make more money, so the money was not an issue. He led me to believe that he still considered himself to be our father.

Craig told me that the reason he didn’t tell my mom he wanted to divorce her in person was that he was afraid she would, “go for the knives” and hurt him. Nothing could be more ridiculous than the idea of my mother being violent. I can’t remember her ever so much as spanking me, much less trying to knife the husband she loved. I told him not to be ridiculous, that there was only one person who had ever been violent in their relationship. He grunted what seemed an affirmation in response. It would take a monumental act of intellectual dishonesty and denial for him to actually believe that.

He went on to say that he intended to set up a trust fund for my continuing education and that of my children. He ended the conversation saying he hoped to talk to me soon, which he did.

In later conversations I learned he was not assuming responsibility for the divorce. He did not seem to believe that it warranted his personal attention. He never expressed concern about my Mother’s physical health, which had been failing recently, as he well knew. He expressed no concern for her heart problems. His interest in the divorce was just for himself.

When I talked to Mom she expressed concern about what had happened. She said she still loved him and was worried about him and didn’t know what to think. She was confused and hurt.

Craig has also had a history of being violent with my sister Dawn, engaging in inappropriate conflict with someone who was probably 12 - 14,

One episode in particular I remember took place when we were returning from a family trip. We were in LAX, walking into baggage claim. Craig asked Dawn, who had her hands full, to carry Justin’s bag. Dawn, for obvious reasons, didn’t want to. Craig became enraged. He charged Dawn who was facing him at a dead standstill. She put up her hands to defend herself from the 350 pounds of angry oncoming Craig. Somehow he managed in the very brief moment of their contact to fall over, failing in what I assume was an attempt to punish her for her assertion of personal autonomy.

I recall people applauding, understandably, since you have to wonder why a man of that size would take a running leap at his daughter in a public place.

I have always been under the impression that Craig was my father. He always introduced himself as my father. Never as my step-father. He always said he had six kids.

Signed, June 1999

- Electronically -

Thursday, May 17, 2012

The Propaganda Strategy of Frequent Repetition of The Lie

 Laura, presently styling herself as 'Duchess of Manchester,"  posts at the blog from which  the comment at the bottom of this post was copied.  She clearly authored the comment.

Read the previous Post on this site for the longer answer to the question she poses on 'why would the Duke of Manchester go through an expensive divorce...'. 

Family Values' appears to have a very interesting meaning in the minds of the Duke and Duchess.

To answer the question below in short form, Alex filed for divorce and served papers on Wendy in December of 2006 so he could extort alimony and child support from Wendy.  He had joined dating sites some months previously and quickly moved his present 'duchess' into the family home to assist him as he continued the brain washing process on the children. 

Duke Alex claimed to be destitute.  

In court he was found to have, in his possession, funds amounting to nearly a million dollars which he had attempted to hide. Don't for a moment think this was money earned.  It appears to have come from the sale of the Manchester Jewels, another loss for the heritage of his formerly respected family.

Back in court, Alex sat on the stand continuing his claims to be destitute.  However, at least one of his bank accounts was located and he was confronted there by Wendy's attorney with written documentation, obtained through subpoena of his bank, with his own account information. 

What followed will soon be available here through the transcript.  If you are a journalist, and are researching the Manchesters, contact us and we will provide the files immediately.

Alex's 'medical needs' were not caused by injuries but by his various expenditures for cosmetic surgery, including, according to Wendy, a colon reduction to help him reduce his growing weight. 

This surgery took place at Tri-City Regional Medical Center.  Alex had a bypass, which he told his wife, Wendy, was 'back surgery.'  Since the family medical insurance was obtained through Wendy's employer the only source for this elective surgery would have been the funds from sale of the Manchester Jewels.

Alexander, Duke of Manchester, wanted to keep all the assets from a fraudulent marriage while forcing his victim to pay for the doubtful privilege of having been victimized.  This is Family Values, Manchester Style.

Here is what Laura is REALLY saying, "Why did you have to point out what Alex did?  It would have been so much more convenient for us is you would shut up."

Laura, that is not going to happen.  Get used to the truth. 

LINK
"Tell Me,Why would, The Duke of Manchester go thru a expensive legal divorce knowing he was not legally married. We all went thru the divorce. He had no Money to give his children.Wendy Montagu Buford has made more money than her husband for several years.All she wants to do is call the press This court case could have been done Quietly without bringing attention to her children as Bastards to the entire public! Nice mother!"